Pensions Green Paper - Unite summary and initial comment ‘A state pension for the 21st Century’

This covers the Government’s proposals for a £140 a week state pension. The proclaimed objectives of this reform are to reduce complexity and means-testing, to create a clearer incentive to save for retirement and to offer better benefits to offset disadvantage to the low paid and to women in the current pension system.

The Green Paper also proposes that State Pension Age ought to be increased beyond 66 sooner than previously planned and invites views on whether this should be determined by an automatic mechanism (for which no model is specified) or following a periodic review

Contrary to the pre-launch publicity for the £140 idea, there is no general increase in state pensions and since the reform is cost-neutral there will have to be losers to offset any winners.

Option 1 – Faster Flat-rating

This option accelerates the evolution of State Second Pension (S2P) to become a flat-rate benefit worth £1.60 a week for each year of contributions. This would have happened in the mid-2030’s but is brought forward to 2020. It ends the concept of an earnings–related state benefit. Qualifying conditions, for Basic State Pension (BSP) and S2P, and the basis of increases in payment could remain different, as now, or moves could be made to harmonise them.

Although it would deliver £145 a week after 30 years contributions, this Option is not an improvement on current benefits (it actually reduces accrual over the next twenty years for many S2P contributors).

Option 2 – A single flat-rate pension

This Option combines BSP and S2P. The target benefit of £140 is clearly well above the level of the Basic State Pension (£97.65), and above the Savings Credit means-tested minimum income (£132.60). It would require 30 years of paid or credited contributions to qualify for the full benefit. Qualification conditions and indexation arrangements would be based on the BSP model rather than the more restricted S2P model. It would mean the end to all contracting-out and so have implications for defined benefit pension schemes

This is a simpler and more inclusive pension, but with difficult transitional provisions. Clear losers are those who would pay or be credited with more than 30 years contributions to S2P. Winners appear to be those who might presently qualify for BSP but would fail to achieve 30 years in S2P

Unite policy has supported an increase in the BSP to reduce means-testing but also the retention of an earnings-related second tier state pension.  The reforms may lead to clearer incentives to save but may increase the need to save for a lot of people whose state benefits are reduced