Charity bosses’ ‘City pay culture’ should be curbed, says Unite
9th November 2009
The excessive City pay culture is seeping into the remuneration
packages of charity bosses and should be curbed, Unite, the largest
union in the country, has said.
Unite, which has 60,000 members in the not for profit sector, is
concerned that some chief executives are earning more than the
prime minister’s annual salary of £197,000.
And while chief executive pay soars at a rate of 6% per
cent a year, many charity workers are struggling with wages just
above the national minimum wage (NMW) of £5.80 an hour.
Unite is calling for charities to look closely at the rates of
pay of all their employees and to iron out inequalities. Unite
favours flat pay increases for everyone, rather than percentage
rises, as this would benefit the lower paid.
Unite is concerned that the growing pay inequalities are a
symptom of a ‘greed culture’ across the economy, and would like the
proposal for a High Pay Commission to be set up quickly to
radically tackle this trend, which is leading to fissures in
society.
Unite highlighted the pay of Anchor Trust's chief executive,
John Belcher, whose pay was £391,000 in 2008/09, while many of his
employees, running homes for the elderly, are living on wages
just above the NMW. Mr Belcher resigned from his post last
week.
Other examples of ‘excess’ include:
• Riverside Housing Group’s highest paid director received
(emoluments excluding pension contributions) £231,000 in 2008
• UK Film Council’s chief executive officer received
between £205,000 and £210,000 in 2008
• The National Trust in 2009 paid between £160,000 and
£169,999 to a top member of staff
• In 2008, Age Concern paid a senior staff member between
£100,001 and £120,000
• The RSPB in 2008 rewarded a staff member with emoluments
between £100,001 and £110,000.
Rachael Maskell, Unite national officer, not for profit sector
said: ‘"It is quite clear that the insidious City culture of
excessive pay is seeping into the packages of some not for profit
sector chief executives.’
‘"This is to be deplored as it corrupts the ethos of the
voluntary sector and is an insult to those, often on average
incomes, who donate to charity. I think the general public will be
shocked by the scale of the packages that some executives are being
awarded. This sector is losing its sense of what real value
is.’
‘"It has also contributed to great and unfair disparities
between the pay of the chief executives and top directors, and
other members of staff, as this is being replicated across other
sectors of society.’
‘"It is not right that a charity boss earns much more than the
prime minister. Flat pay increases of a set amount should be
introduced, instead of percentage rises, as this would reduce pay
disparities, which is hitting, in particular, women, disabled
people, ethnic minorities and part-time workers.’
"
Rachael Maskell made clear that Unite’s fire was directed at the
excessive pay packages and not at the majority of charities whose
chief executives earn on average £57,000 annually, while those
running small charities take home a modest £33,000 a year.
ENDS
Email to a friend